David's using some big words here and killing my spacing on the title...LOL Here's what I love about this post. It's simply a great rant. David walks the talk and is active in a number of different forums. After one of his comments I picked up the phone and called him. That led to a lengthy conversation about the challenges in the industry and in turn the importance of making yourself and your work different. I offered him the opportunity to do a guest post and here it is. You'll find more about David on his site. I wanted to share two of David's videos with you, because he's anything but a commodity item. After you've watched either or both of the videos, put yourself in the shoes of his client and imagine their excitement and enthusiasm. We're a word-of-mouth business and you've got to make your work standout. To preface my note - these thoughts are stemmed from a photographer who went public and shared how today's brides are better off buying disposable cameras and having their guests take the photos, instead of hiring professional photographers! Perhaps, guests should all bring cupcakes, iPods and their own floral arrangements too? Here are my thoughts about that particular article... What really bugged me is that the article is from a photographer. I keep saying it and I know photographers keep on saying "nuh uh!" - but photographers new, old, student and everything in between are nearly at 100% at fault for the industry being the way it is. I keep saying quit being all open source, sharing all the "individualism" of one's own style, how they process and how they shoot, because the photography industry is flat-lining at an exponential rate. But! I get it though... new photographers and lazy photographers want the quick buck, the easy way to do something. BUT! And here's the big jagged pill that the egocentric photographer doesn't want to swallow. All this open sourced'ness is resulting in the homogenization and commoditization of photography. Combine that with photographers stroking their egos with self importance of "look what I can do" - sharing every effin thing they know about how to take a photo, how to process a photo and how to do anything in photography - creates two words that come to mind - Flat Line. No peaks, no valleys, no individuality. Just a bunch of presets, actions and over-processed glib crap. But hey, let's all jump on the ship of sharing ideas, how to do our work and be popular telling clients all they need are crappy disposable cameras, give our colleagues the keys to each other's kingdoms on doing things and keep on driving down the photography industry. Just imagine if BMW, Ferrari, Apple, or any other company did the same thing that many of today's "photographers" do. Everyone's cars would look even more the same, our computers would be more the same, and everything else would be all the same. What a very grey world it would be filed with lazy, conforming people lacking all the genius our human minds were given. Like I shared with a college class in San Diego. If you can start with a blank canvas and fill it with our own ideas, our own identity and our own perception of the world. Why the hell would we as a creative collective want to copy each other's ideas, identities and perception of the world? That doesn't make someone a photographer, it makes them just a lame-ass and no better than what Milli Vanilli did back in the 80's. So I challenge anyone who is reading what I'm sharing to get behind the camera, get your shot right in the camera and then go home, get on your computer and use whatever program you use to edit your photo and NOT use a preset, action or someone else's idea on how to process your photo. Then, when you're totally satisfied with how you processed your photo with your own take on things, your own identity and your own creative mind. KEEP ALL YOUR BLOODY CREATIVITY TO YOURSELF. Quit short strokin' your ego with self importance and then go back out and out do yourself with your next shoot. Rinse and Repeat each time until what you do is your own self expression and not some copycat cloned piece of crap that you got lazy on. Of course, this is my opinion. But I still stand firm & don't believe that the great masters in the photography industry or any other creative industry that has stood the test of time - ever sought out to ape or parrot another artist because they're too lazy to do it themselves. David Esquire
4 Comments
1/31/2014 02:42:18 am
Where I do agree with most of the post, the driver for a LOT of this 'give it away' stuff is:
Reply
1/31/2014 06:08:23 am
I hope I don't get in trouble with Skip for writing this. I probably won't be able to get by him at a show after this. David, you make some good points and I think a lot of your views are valid but please don't show me an Animoto slide show afterwards. It seems that even you sometimes take the easy way out and copy what others are doing. I don't think it's bad to copy another's work. That's how you learn. And once you get that down to where you can do it you are ready to take it to the next level and make it your own. The greatest photographers throughout history didn't necessarily start in doing amazing work in their own special style. It took them years to get there. For the truly greats, they didn't start out that way, they weren't born with a camera in their hands, they learned it. There is nothing wrong with copying someone else's style unless you aren't good at picking the right person to copy from. That just perpetuates poor photography. What I see so much of today is going out in the backyard, on a cloudy day, and just shooting away with nothing other than a camera for equipment. And then you just shoot a thousand shots and something is bound to be good. There is an awful lot of this going on today. Then the neighbor sees what's going on and one day they are short on money and are looking for a way to make a little money so they figure they can do it too. Then like rabbits it starts to multiply. Everyone is doing it. Too bad they can't be made to only use one shot. That would be a real test. The customer says I would like you to do my family portrait but you can only push the button on the camera once. If it's good we want 10-framed 30x40's and we will pay whatever you want. That would be a REAL test! I think we would have a bunch of newbies give up photography real quick. Or, in David's case how about a wedding photographer that is required to used only ISO 100 and can only use one camera with one fixed focal length lens to do the whole wedding. Here again, I think we would have a lot of photographers drop out and look for another line of work. This is where you learn to be really creative. In these cases you have to KNOW what you're doing. This is why, as David points out, all these people shoot their mediocre to poor images and drop a photoshop filter and run a pre-set action on their images to save them and call it artistic. And bad color, hey that's no problem, see what they did in this fashion magazine out of NYC. The color doesn't have to be right. I go back now to the part I wrote about picking the right person to emulate. The new photographers have no clue what is good and what is bad and who they should try to be like. And it's easier to do a bad job than a good one, so they rise to the top of their game in nothing flat. There's more, much more. I could keep on going on this topic but looking back, I've written too much now. Skip if you don't want to post this, it's OK. It's way too long.
Reply
1/31/2014 08:01:25 am
Dave (how the heck have you been?), this is so true. Everyone should be worried about developing their own eye and presenting their work through that. Way too many people look to others and develop a schtick (or what some call a "style") based on what they've seen others do. You've said it well.
Reply
2/3/2014 06:46:49 am
Thank you so much for the opportunity to chat about a very real issue that is happening in our industry Skip! I hope that this article will inspire others to take stock of what's happening & be a part of the solution that will help elevate our industry. :-)
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
November 2016
|